Full Body Scanners, the Ineffective Way to Fight Terrorism

The United States Transportation Security Administration recently announced its intention of introducing up to 150 new full body scanners in airports. There’s been a lot of backlash from travelers and taxpayers regarding potential health concerns, costs, and time delays.  In light of this, there’s one other big question that needs answered. How effective will these machines be at eliminating the threat of terrorism on U.S. planes?

Do They Work?

Full body scanners either use x-rays or radio waves to view the first layer right under the clothes. Unlike, medical imaging instruments, they’re not designed to penetrate the skin. Do they do what they’re supposed to? The answer is yes. Unlike a metal detector, the scan can expose things hidden directly under clothes. 

The bigger question is whether it’s effective or not in terms of scanning for contraband? The problem is, the scan does not penetrate enough to be able to view body cavities and/or orifices. Even a large fold of fat on an obese person can be a place to hide objects from the device .Storing items in such places has been a long time favorite of drug smugglers. Don’t expect that to change with this new initiative and look for terrorists to take up the practice.

 Too Little

The full body scan simply will not deter the most dangerous terrorists.  Those groups that are well organized will have no problems getting around a simple system like this. Over time these scanners are likely to thwart a few threats of the mentally unstable variety but it’s likely that our most serious threats will see them as a minor obstacle in their path. 

Are there alternatives?

Some feel that the TSA may be jumping the gun by putting all of its money into body scanners. Currently, there are two other alternatives that have some merit. The TSA has tinkered with the “puffer” and the “guardian”. Both use chemicals to see if there are explosive devices on a person. The guardian can even detect substances in hard to monitor places like shoes. Of course, these devices have their own weaknesses, mostly around the maintenance of the machines.  Still, the TSA might want to save its money and see if either one is a viable option once improvements are made.

In conclusion one would find it very difficult to say that full body scanners will actually deter or prevent any terrorist attacks. For it to work a terrorist would have to be extremely illogical in his or her thought pattern to think that a weapon or bomb could be smuggled right under their clothes.  It’s highly unlikely that the initiative will make any real dent in serious terrorist activities. As such, a better path would probably be to spend the funds on more worthwhile efforts such as intelligence.

 

 

Related News Articles

Shares drop of full-body scanner maker OSI Systems
Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:49 -0700
Shares of OSI Systems Inc. tumbled Monday after the company said the government had begun proceedings related to its full-body scanners used in airports that had raised privacy concerns. The move could ...

Speak out now on the TSA's full-body scanners
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:09:30 -0700
It's been almost five years since the Transportation Security Administration quietly began installing its so-called Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) — better known as full-body scanners — at airports nationwide. And now the government wants to know what you think of the machines.        

Airport Body Scanners Pass Radiation Tests
Mon, 06 May 2013 07:14:49 -0700
Controversial full-body X-ray scanners at U.S. airports underwent more than 700 inspections last year, with all tests showing radiation levels below standards used by their manufacturer and the Transportation Security Administration, according to a USA TODAY review of the recently released reports.

Were Logan airport security scanners scrapped because of radiation risks?
Wed, 22 May 2013 04:34:49 -0700
I was relieved when I heard the news that Logan airport would be replacing its full body backscatter scanners -- which use small amounts of radiation -- with the millimeter wave scanners that don't use any radiation. The official reason for replacing the security scanner is because of a failure to fulfill a Congressional mandate, which required the machines to have new software to produce less ...

U.S. homeland security notice weighs on OSI Systems' new contracts
Mon, 20 May 2013 09:58:21 -0700
(Reuters) - OSI Systems Inc said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has issued it a "proposed debarment notice" related to privacy concerns over its full-body passenger scanners used in airports, limiting the company's ability to sign new federal government contracts until the issue is resolved. OSI Systems shares fell as much as 17 percent on the Nasdaq on Monday. They were down about 9 ...

High-Tech Shopping: Meet the Future of Retail
Wed, 22 May 2013 07:55:48 -0700
Browsing through a store's clothing selection, trying things on and dealing with a salesperson is so last-century. Now tons of people do a bulk of their shopping, if not all of it, from the comfort of their own home, clicking away at what they like and sending back what doesn't fit. According to a 2012 Forrester report, 58 percent of the U.S. population will be online shoppers by 2016. But that ...

Airport body scanners pass company's radiation tests
Thu, 02 May 2013 18:44:42 -0700
Transportation Security Administration officers demonstrate a backscatter X-ray scanner in October 2010 at John F. Kennedy International Airport. / File photo by Michael Nagle, Getty Images

Fashion students create outfits for plus-size women
Mon, 20 May 2013 09:10:47 -0700
For their Product Development class, Cornell apparel design sophomores Brandon Wen and Laura Zwanziger decided to create a clothing collection designed especially for plus-size women after their research revealed an overlooked market.

OSI Expects Debarment Notice From DHS
Mon, 20 May 2013 14:04:02 -0700
Shares of OSI Systems Inc. fell Monday after the company said its Rapiscan security unit expects to receive a debarment notice from the Department of Homeland Security related to its airport scanner software.

How safe are the new contactless bank cards?
Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:02 -0700
Concerns over the security of these cards have been raised by customers of Marks & Spencer who claim payment was taken from their contactless debit or credit cards when they didn’t try to use them.

Los Angeles International LAX | Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International ATL | Chicago O'Hare International ORD | Dallas/Fort Worth International DFW | Denver International Airport DEN | Las Vegas McCarran International LAS | John F. Kennedy International Airport JFK | Phoenix Sky Harbor International PHX | Houston George Bush Intercontinental IAH | Newark Liberty International EWR | Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County DTW | Minneapolis-Saint Paul International MSP | Orlando International MCO | San Francisco International SFO | Miami International MIA | Philadelphia International PHL | Charlotte/Douglas International CLT | Seattle-Tacoma International SEA | Boston Logan International BOS | New York City LaGuardia LGA | Washington Dulles International IAD | Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall BWI | Salt Lake City International SLC | Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International FLL | Honolulu International HNL | Tampa International TPA | Ronald Reagan Washington National DCA | Chicago Midway International MDW | San Diego International SAN | Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International CVG | Oakland International OAK | Lambert-St. Louis International STL | Portland International PDX | Memphis International MEM | Kansas City International MCI | Cleveland Hopkins International CLE | San Jose International SJC | Sacramento International SMF | Pittsburgh International PIT | Nashville International BNA | Orange County John Wayne Airport SNA | Raleigh-Durham International RDU | Houston William P. Hobby Airport HOU | Indianapolis International IND | Austin-Bergstrom International AUS | San Antonio International SAT | Fort Myers Southwest Florida International RSW | Milwaukee General Mitchell International MKE | Dallas Love Field DAL | Palm Beach International PBI | Hartford - Springfield Bradley International BDL | LA/Ontario International ONT | Port Columbus International CMH | Albuquerque International ABQ | Louis Armstrong New Orleans International MSY | Kahului Airport OGG | Jacksonville International JAX | Burbank Bob Hope Airport BUR | Providence Theodore Francis Green Airport PVD | Reno-Tahoe International RNO | Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC | Tucson International TUS | Omaha Eppley Airfield OMA | Manchester-Boston Regional MHT | Norfolk International ORF | Louisville International SDF | Oklahoma City Will Rogers World Airport OKC | El Paso International ELP | Boise Airport BOI | Richmond International RIC | Spokane International GEG | Tulsa International TUL | Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International BHM | Kona International KOA | Albany International ALB | Greater Rochester International ROC | Agana Antonio B. Won Pat International GUM | Long Beach Airport LGB | Lihue Airport LIH | Dayton International DAY | Little Rock National LIT | Islip Long Island MacArthur Airport ISP | Syracuse Hancock International SYR | Greensboro Piedmont Triad International GSO | Grand Rapids Gerald R. Ford International GRR | Colorado Springs Airport COS | Savannah/Hilton Head International SAV | Des Moines International DSM | Charleston International CHS | Orlando Sanford International SFB | Springfield-Branson National SGF | Knoxville McGhee Tyson Airport TYS | Pensacola Regional Airport PNS | Madison Dane County Regional Airport MSN | Palm Springs International PSP | Greenville-Spartanburg International GSP | Jackson-Evers International JAN | Huntsville International HSV | Wichita Mid-Continent Airport ICT | Buffalo Niagara International BUF